NYCPHP Meetup

NYPHP.org

[nycphp-talk] PHP.NET webmasters

Kyle Tuskey ktuskey at exostream.com
Tue Jul 30 18:05:23 EDT 2002


If any of you have a problem with the creators or contributors to PHP,
then don't use the language.  I know several of them, and I'm sure they
won't mind.  It's like you people are biting the hand that feeds you.
You're ungrateful and shouldn't be using open source if you don't
appreciate it.

-Kyle

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Hise [mailto:jhise at linuxforbusiness.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 5:46 PM
To: NYPHP Talk
Subject: RE: [nycphp-talk] PHP.NET webmasters

If people have a difficult time working for no money. Then they
shouldn't. 


On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 17:01, Kyle Tuskey wrote:
> Can we all stop crying for a few moments to recognize how much time
the
> people that work on the site and documentation take out of their lives
> for no money?  If you have a problem with it then join the team and
help
> them, otherwise stop bitching.  As for the bug system... the open-srm
> crew was working on Bubar, a new bug system, for php.net.  I worked on
> it a bit with them, but time constraints didn't allow much of my time.
> Last I heard Derrick and Jani had put the application on hold, until
> time there was more time available.
> 
> 
> -Kyle
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Herson [mailto:gherson at snet.net] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:31 PM
> To: NYPHP Talk
> Subject: Re: [nycphp-talk] PHP.NET webmasters
> 
> yes, the fascist php.net people (and zend i must say) have left me
> wistful for a 
> generous Larry Wall (or Hans Z. :) character, or even a benevolent
> dictator.
> 
> php.net webmasters ignore 100% of my suggestions and questions which
is
> their 
> right, but you've got to warn your users if your bug reporting system
is
> 
> connected to a Usenet, as in permanently archived, mailing list.
That's
> bad 
> when you've packed the report full of personal contact info like i
did. 
> Hopefully they fixed it. I did let Rasmus Lerdorf know a couple times
> about it.
> 
> I also couldn't understand how they could add commands to the language
> w/o 
> having a better definition of what it actually did.  Surely the person
> who 
> implemented the command/function could have provided a decent
> description with 
> example.  Lately the site has obviously fleshed-out, however.
> 
> george
> 
> nyphp at jimbishop.org wrote:
> > has anyone else had the displeasure of speaking to anyone on the
> > webmaster's list for php.net?  i sent them some mail this morning
> where i
> > outlined a problem i had finding some documentation on monday, and
> they
> > went psycho, insinuating that i can't read and all kinds of
> > nonsense.  they were really rude.
> > 
> > has anyone else had this experience?
> > 
> > jim.bishop
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 








More information about the talk mailing list