[nycphp-talk] Macromedia Contribute ...
jsiegel1 at optonline.net
Tue Aug 26 11:22:46 EDT 2003
I've been using DreamWeaver and Fireworks since ver. 3. I've been quite
pleased with the results.
From: talk-bounces at lists.nyphp.org [mailto:talk-bounces at lists.nyphp.org]
On Behalf Of Aaron Fischer
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:48 AM
To: NYPHP Talk
Subject: Re: [nycphp-talk] Macromedia Contribute ...
It may have room for improvement but their stuff is still better then
anything else that's out there. Dreamweaver is the best wysiwig and
Fireworks totally blew away Photoshop as far as creating graphics for
the web and is still well ahead.
Aren't bugs and fixes/upgrades a symptom of most commercially produced
apps out there? They all seem to suck in one regard or the other.
Pick your poison. The solution is to hire high paid in house
On Tuesday, Aug 26, 2003, at 10:33 US/Eastern, Jeff Knight wrote:
> If the Macromedia of the future is going to be anything like the way
> Macromedia has been developing over the last five years, you're going
> to get locked into using a buggy, unstable application. Any future
> bug-fixes will be released as upgrades you must pay for loaded with
> new buggy features.
talk mailing list
talk at lists.nyphp.org
More information about the talk