[nycphp-talk] OT - meta tags
inforequest
1j0lkq002 at sneakemail.com
Sun Apr 23 18:14:17 EDT 2006
michael lists-at-genoverly.net |nyphp dev/internal group use| wrote:
>I have a client that someone has convinced that gobs of meta tags in the
>headers is vital to the success of their website. I'm happy to comply,
>but, aren't some of these meta tags soooo 90's?
>
> <meta name="robots" content="" />
> <meta name="description" content="" />
> <meta name="keywords" content="" />
> <meta name="category" content="" />
> <meta name="author" content="" />
> <meta name="date" content="" />
> <meta name="updated" content="" />
> <meta name="copyright" content="" />
>
>
>
everyone has an opinion :-)
Numbering them from the top down.
#1 is a very useful tool, but not when it's empty
#2 is essential
#3 is very, very useful
#4 I never use
#5 I never use
#6 I never use
#7 I never use
#8 is a legal technicality I rarely use, but has a place and is used by
some scanners.
-=john andrews
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.seo-fun.com
"writing is often like driving a truck at night without headlights, losing your way along the road and spending a decade in a ditch" -- Gay Talese
More information about the talk
mailing list