[nycphp-talk] The Difference Between OutSourcing and OpenSourcing is More Than a Few Letters
faber at linuxnj.com
Tue Jun 29 21:35:13 EDT 2004
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 06:53:28PM -0400, Tim Gales wrote:
> I just don't get it.
> Why would companies who are being held
> hostage by closed source consulting
> companies want to take on the new burdens
> of creating super explicit level of
> service requirements (sometimes down
> to the module level) and reams and
> reams of technical specifications;
> and then later create acceptance test
> plans which cover minutia.
> I think that this outsourcing thing is
> just a faze.
You may be closer than you think. A potential client I Was talking to
is married to a VP of a large comapny. We were discussing outsourcing
and he mentioned (implying that the VPs were thinking this way) that
outsourcing was being used to drop salary requirements for techs; move
work offshore, lay off people, salaries drop, then bring the work back on
shore hire the techies at much lower prices.
Now, I'm not the type to wear tin-foil hats but I'm seriously thinking
about it. :-)
BTW, does anyone know of a successful off-shored project that wasn't
brought back on-shore because it was a disaster? I've never heard of
Linux New Jersey: Open Source Solutions for New Jersey
More information about the talk