NYCPHP Meetup

[Brian D.]

> Time for another framework folks :)

This technically is not a framework, but it's interesting:

http://www.persvr.org/

- Brian D.

realm3 web applications [realm3.com]
Information architecture, application development.
phone: (917) 512-3594
fax: (440) 744-3559



On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Hans Zaunere<lists at zaunere.com> wrote:
>> In a prior engagement, we were using XUL as the view and JSON as the
>> communication protocol.  This was nice, since the entire user interface
>> resided on the user's desktop (as a Firefox Add-on), all we needed to
>> transmit was the data.  Of course, you need to be using HTML, so
>> transpose the XUL I'm showing here into HTML.  The framework we created
>> used a consistent naming scheme, so the names of elements in the XUL
>> matched identifiers in the database.
>
> Thanks Dan and all for their feedback.
>
> >From what I've gleamed from this discussion and others, Javascript code for
> any given modern web application, is ever increasing.  It's getting more and
> more complex, to the point, dare I say, that much of the MVC functionality
> is actually living in the browser, and less so on the server - the server is
> becoming dumber and only performs simple operations and consistency/security
> checks.
>
> I think this really begs some questions on current server-side frameworks
> and the MVC methodology.  Changes like this have already begun, namely in
> RoR and other platforms.
>
> Time for another framework folks :)
>
> H
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> New York PHP User Group Community Talk Mailing List
> http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
> http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
>